Typical scenario

Tire patterns overlapped in one rut

Similar tread elements in wet ground may be treated as one impression although different wheels passed successively. Examine overlap and a submitted tire, separating tread pattern from soil deformation, sliding and later vehicle passage.

What needs to be clarified

Identify comparable track areas and overlap features, then compare submitted tires while allowing for ground distortion and post-event tread changes.

Materials to prepare

  • Scaled whole-track and overlap photographs taken before recovery
  • Casts of surviving three-dimensional impressions linked to a site plan
  • Submitted marked tires with post-event use information

What to compare

Compare block sequence, tread width and groove relationships; assess smearing and soil compression. Map overlapping portions separately. Record test-impression conditions and check repeatability of accidental tread features; a standard-pattern match is not a vehicle-specific conclusion.

Possible outcome of the analysis

An overlap map and comparison plates may assess usable areas; findings may be limited to class features, exclusion or inability to resolve the question.

Limits of the conclusions

A tire impression identifies no driver and dates no passage by itself. Wear, load and soil affect appearance; a fragment cannot reliably reconstruct the entire tread.

Write to usDiscuss your task ↗